Salsa Competition over the weekend
The Jitterbugs Competition was great fun... Man, the fight was a damn tight one... I think most of the contestants could easily have won... It's so close, I'm glad that I wasn't judging. Sheesh! It was tough man.
Way to go my fellow Xen ppl! I think you all did a superb job, considering that most of you are still so new to dancing. heehee... We're proud of you all for putting in so much hard work and pushing yourselves to the next level. Keekee... It's actually a whole new experience not competing... Fun, less nerve-wrecking, but not so rewarding in terms of experience. =) After all, Principal Ong and I juz returned from Taiwan 2 days b4 the competition, and kanna flu summore...
Clothes! I finally have things to wear!
Anywayz, I have a closet full of clothes from Taiwan! yeah! Oh but half of them are bikini tops or blink blink items... only wearable in xen or while dancing... anywhere else, I'll have ppl staring at me, half of them with the "wat's she doinig wearing nothing around" look and the other half with the "????" look... For some reason, it's quite a crime to dress up in Singapore, but I'm singaporean and I also lazy to dress up sometimes too lah... Still, it's polite to dress nicely and not in rags, juz like body odor and bad breath... And it's fun! (yeah call me bimbo...) I wonder what will happen if I go to school dressed in tank top and a mini skirt? Guyz eyes may drop out and gals will stare daggers behind my back? Hmmm dun think i'll wanna try it...
Tuesday, June 27
Monday, June 5
On Judging for the AC Dance Examinations...
Fair? Or unfair?
I heard some comments about the judging criteria for the exams. I'd like to say one thing from my previous experience in Ballet examinations. Our ballet examiners are brought in from overseas (mostly from UK) to judge in the different schools. They are alwiz different people, and they all have their own marking preferences. I recall my ballet teacher saying things like, "this examiner likes expression", or "this examiner is very strict on technique"... They all have their own preferences and mark differently from other examiners.
I remember frens trying for 3 times to pass an exam, failing the first 2 times coz the examiner was very strict, but scoring very high the 3rd time coz the examiner was lenient... Examiners are inevitably humans after all.
Although there is a marking system - scores for timing, musicality, interpretation and expression, technique, etc - each examiner gives scores differently. In other words, you may score very high this year due to your strong techniques that the examiner favors, but be marked down next year because the other examiner was looking for expression and musicality that you did not provide enuf to meet her standard. As such, so-and-so may score lower last year, but higher than you this year.
A scoring sheet helps, but in the end, the examination is still marked by people wiith their own subjective preferences, so it may be fair across the board on average but it is not alwiz precise. Note that judging is done by humans, and all humans have differing preferences.
The only way to ensure that you are better than the rest is to be so good that you're clearly better than them in all aspects of the dance. Also, you have to be judged in the same examination to see where you stand as compared to the other students (Otherwise it's not easy to compare).
Another thing to note is that your standard today, may be different from your standard tomorrow or next week or next year. You may panic in the exam or screw up your routine; you may have stage fright, or you may excel in the examination environment. The judging depends on the student's performance in the exams. I have taught many little gals who were very good in class but they totally freaked out in the exams, and as such, scored very low... Not fair, but hey, you're judged by your performance at that time, in front of the examiner, not by how good you are supposed to be normally. Principal Ong tries to prevent this stage fright thingy by forcing the students to do run-throughs with the lighting and everything, to minimise the chances of screwing up.
To sum it all up, judging is done by humans and human's opinions are subjective. As such it is inevitably 'unfair' to a certain extent. We try to keep it fair and consistent, but dancing is after all an art, and unless we do dance in a multiple choice format (MCQ) it's hard to be super consistent.
And for the people who did not perform their best their best in the exams, dun worry, this is not the last one... there's another one coming up. And soon... =)
Fair? Or unfair?
I heard some comments about the judging criteria for the exams. I'd like to say one thing from my previous experience in Ballet examinations. Our ballet examiners are brought in from overseas (mostly from UK) to judge in the different schools. They are alwiz different people, and they all have their own marking preferences. I recall my ballet teacher saying things like, "this examiner likes expression", or "this examiner is very strict on technique"... They all have their own preferences and mark differently from other examiners.
I remember frens trying for 3 times to pass an exam, failing the first 2 times coz the examiner was very strict, but scoring very high the 3rd time coz the examiner was lenient... Examiners are inevitably humans after all.
Although there is a marking system - scores for timing, musicality, interpretation and expression, technique, etc - each examiner gives scores differently. In other words, you may score very high this year due to your strong techniques that the examiner favors, but be marked down next year because the other examiner was looking for expression and musicality that you did not provide enuf to meet her standard. As such, so-and-so may score lower last year, but higher than you this year.
A scoring sheet helps, but in the end, the examination is still marked by people wiith their own subjective preferences, so it may be fair across the board on average but it is not alwiz precise. Note that judging is done by humans, and all humans have differing preferences.
The only way to ensure that you are better than the rest is to be so good that you're clearly better than them in all aspects of the dance. Also, you have to be judged in the same examination to see where you stand as compared to the other students (Otherwise it's not easy to compare).
Another thing to note is that your standard today, may be different from your standard tomorrow or next week or next year. You may panic in the exam or screw up your routine; you may have stage fright, or you may excel in the examination environment. The judging depends on the student's performance in the exams. I have taught many little gals who were very good in class but they totally freaked out in the exams, and as such, scored very low... Not fair, but hey, you're judged by your performance at that time, in front of the examiner, not by how good you are supposed to be normally. Principal Ong tries to prevent this stage fright thingy by forcing the students to do run-throughs with the lighting and everything, to minimise the chances of screwing up.
To sum it all up, judging is done by humans and human's opinions are subjective. As such it is inevitably 'unfair' to a certain extent. We try to keep it fair and consistent, but dancing is after all an art, and unless we do dance in a multiple choice format (MCQ) it's hard to be super consistent.
And for the people who did not perform their best their best in the exams, dun worry, this is not the last one... there's another one coming up. And soon... =)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)